The Curtis File
On transferring priests:
Q: What was the purpose, Bishop, of the reassigning to a different parish?
Curtis: Well, I presume it was to allow him to have a fresh start.
Q: All right, when he was assigned to a different parish, would anyone be advised of the problem which he had previously had?
Q: Were there any priests during the time that you were bishop that were transferred to a different diocese because they were found to be guilty, if you will, of pedophilic conduct in the Diocese of Bridgeport?
Q: Did you understand that to be a temporary condition or a disease, or what was your understanding of it when you were bishop of Bridgeport?
Curtis: I don't think I saw this is as a permanent condition. It was a - more incidental.
Q: More incidental. And what do you mean by incidental, if I may ask? Incidental to what?
Curtis: Well, it would happen on occasion. It wasn't a sort of a, it wasn't - I'm not sure how to state it.
Q: In other words, it wasn't a continual thing. It was an occasional thing?
Curtis: Yes. Yes.
Q: You had mentioned before that there were times that you would take a complaint in regard to a priest and take it out of the file. I think you said because it was old, or -
Curtis: Out of the secret file.
Q: Out of the secret file, OK, and where would you put that when you took it out?
Curtis: I would destroy it.
Q: You'd destroy it.
Q: And what was - give me an example of what would be the reason you would do that.
Curtis: Well, it would be - it would be an antiquated issue, happened so long before, there was no point in preserving it any longer.