A top federal housing official says it might matter a lot, especially when minimal or no separate services are performed to justify extra charges beyond the regular commission.
Helen R. Kanovsky, general counsel at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, clarified the government's position on controversial add-on fees in a recent letter to industry lawyers.
During the last several years, many brokerage companies began adding extra fees onto their commissions to generate higher revenues.
The fees came with a variety of names -- "processing" and "ABC" among others -- and were charged to sellers and buyers, payable at closing.
But a U.S. District Court decision last year threw the industry into an uproar when a judge said add-on fees violate federal law when there are no specific services performed to justify the extra cost to consumers.
Though the decision directly affected only an estimated 30,000 transactions by a brokerage firm based in Alabama, the National Assn. of Realtors and other industry groups urged brokers and agents to reexamine their approach to pricing.
HUD, which is the agency that oversees federal consumer protections in real estate settlements across the country, never issued detailed guidance to the industry after the court decision on what's legal -- and what's not -- until Kanovsky's letter.
Here's what she said, in essence: Federal law does not govern how much realty brokers can charge their customers. But it does govern how brokers and agents disclose their compensation to consumers.
Commissions may be quoted "using a flat fee, a percentage of the sales price, or a combination" of the two. The revised HUD-1 settlement sheet in use nationwide since Jan. 1 has item lines where the commission charges and splits can be listed.
However, Kanovsky warned that if the total charges "exceed the amount of the commission for listing and selling the home that are reflected in the real estate broker's or agent's listing agreement," then HUD has the legal power to review the extra charge "to determine whether additional services were provided" to justify the add-on.
If little or no services are performed, HUD would treat this as a violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.
Kanovsky also warned about fees charged when there is no contract or agreement permitting the agent or broker to impose those charges.
For example, if a listing broker charged the buyer an administrative fee of $250 but there was no contractual language sanctioning the charge, HUD might treat that add-on as an illegal fee.
What's the likely practical effect of HUD's clarifications?
Steve Murray, a consultant to real estate brokers and editor of Real Trends, an industry journal, said many of the largest firms tightened up their procedures on commission rates and fees after last year's district court decision.
But some smaller and mid-size firms "probably haven't gotten the word yet," Murray says.
Still other firms have agents who tack on and pocket their own extra fees on top of the broker's commission and administrative fees -- a practice that Murray considers vulnerable to legal challenge.
Brokers who quote admin fees separately on top of their commissions insist that they constitute an integral part of their compensation package and are fully justified by the work provided to clients.
For example, Chris Heller of Heller Real Estate Group of Encinitas says his standard charge is 6% plus a $695 "transaction" or administrative fee.
The fee pays for the work of the "administrative people" who assist on all transactions, Heller said. Only 2 out of 10 clients even ask about the charge or its purpose, he said, "and maybe 1 out of 10 takes issue with it."
Bottom line: Ask about all compensation and fees in any transaction. If you're asked to pay fees that you've never heard of or that come with vague justifications, don't roll over.
Just say no.
Distributed by the Washington Post Writers Group.